The landscape of corporate lending in the United States is entering a new phase as regulators roll back longstanding restrictions on leveraged lending. In a move that signals a major shift in financial oversight, the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have withdrawn their decade-old guidance that governed how banks could issue highly leveraged loans. This decision overturns a framework introduced in 2013 and is expected to reshape the balance of power between traditional banks and private credit lenders.
Leveraged lending is a type of financing often used by companies with significant existing debt, especially when they are funding mergers, acquisitions, or other large corporate deals. For years, banks were the primary players in this market. However, the guidance introduced in 2013 by the OCC, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC imposed stricter credit standards, which regulators believed were necessary at the time to prevent banks from taking on excessive risk. These rules drew a line at debt levels roughly six times a company’s EBITDA and required intense oversight for deals that crossed that threshold. While banks were still allowed to issue such loans, they faced deep regulatory scrutiny unless borrowers could demonstrate that a substantial amount of their debt could be repaid within five to seven years.
Over time, banks argued that the framework had become overly restrictive. They said the rules limited their ability to use normal risk-management tools and pushed borrowers toward lenders operating outside the regulated banking system. Private credit funds and other non-bank financial institutions quickly moved in to fill the gap, expanding rapidly as banks retreated. This shift contributed to the rise of the private credit industry, which has grown into one of the fastest-expanding corners of the financial sector.
By withdrawing the guidance, regulators are now signaling a desire to bring leveraged lending activity back into the banking sector. Without the old restrictions, traditional banks may once again compete directly with private lenders for large corporate financing deals. This could mean more lending activity takes place under the supervision of federal regulators instead of moving into less transparent non-bank channels. It also suggests a broader effort to create a friendlier regulatory environment for banks, something that aligns with other recent decisions that halted plans for tougher capital requirements.
For borrowers, the change could open new doors. Highly indebted companies that once turned to private lenders because banks were constrained may now find more competitive terms and a wider range of financing options. For banks, it marks an opportunity to regain market share in a segment they once dominated.
See Related: Bank Of England Considers First Rate Cut Since 2020 Amid Inflation Slowdown: Report
Credit Risk Standards
Although the previous rules were designed to limit risk, regulators now say that banks should rely on broad, established credit-risk standards to manage leveraged lending. This represents a shift away from one-size-fits-all restrictions and toward greater flexibility in evaluating each borrower’s circumstances. The expectation is that banks will still maintain discipline but can do so without being bound by rigid numerical thresholds.
The withdrawal of the guidance also highlights how financial regulation evolves based on market conditions. When the 2013 rules were introduced, the market for leveraged lending was booming, and regulators feared that excessive risk-taking could destabilize the system. A decade later, the rise of private credit has created a parallel lending ecosystem that operates outside of traditional regulatory boundaries. By easing the constraints on banks, regulators seem to be acknowledging that pushing too much lending activity into the shadows may create its own risks.
As the new landscape takes shape, competition between banks and private credit firms is expected to intensify. The banking sector may benefit from renewed participation in lucrative corporate loan markets, while private lenders will likely fight hard to maintain their edge. Borrowers could become the main beneficiaries of this competition, gaining easier access to financing and potentially better terms.
This regulatory shift marks a significant moment for the U.S. financial sector. It signals not only a more relaxed stance on leveraged lending but also a broader effort to reshape where and how major corporate loans are made. As banks step back into the arena, the balance between regulation, risk, and opportunity will define the next chapter of America’s lending market.
